I Saw the picture. The toes, the Mouff.. And was almost as grossed out as the first time I Saw a guy eat a booger. I didn't look at the leg. Reading All those Sherlock Ho!mes books was entertaining,, but sometimes I think I didn't learn a Dammed thing. Hell,even without the scientific measurement to get a reasonable scale worked out,, that leg is just Way smaller than it Otta be. In my defense, I was not interested in the leg,,nope,, the toes in the mouth sent me scrolling..
The Oscar is held in front of the face, so you can't simply assume measurements in one plane are the same as measurements in another.
The equation for an apparent height of 4.85 inches is:
4.85 * d2/d1 where d1 is the distance to the Oscar and d2 is the distance to the face for focus at infinity. If you want to include the focal length of the camera, a slightly better one is:
4.85* (d2-f)/d1-f).
You don't know any of these numbers.
Similarly, the leg is not really in the plane of the camera, so there is foreshortening there as well.
And I work with a girl, mid-20's, not a midget, but really short. Maybe all of 4'10", maybe. If not for her face, you'd assume she was 10 years old. When she's all decked out in safety gear she looks like a kid on Halloween. I didn't know they made steel toed work boots that small. So there's that.
But yeah, Quentin's a perv. Always has been. There's a foot fetish in all his movies. Boobs, butts, long hair, nice smile, long legs, I get all those things. But feet? Nope, not a thing for me.
I'm an amateur nipplologist. It's a sadly underappreciated specialty. Much of the world's problems would be greatly reduced if we focussed more on nipples.
His left hand, however, definitively is in the same focal plane as the statue. The base of the statue is an accurate metric of reference to measure the mystery foot. Observe, the left hand and that foot are also the same focal plane. The old axiom, from the foot, we know the man, it appears the mystery person is about 13, or less. No visual indicators of dwarfism, or other physical anomolies. The appearance is not of a more developed anatomy, minimizing the likelihood of a person post pubescent/adult. Psychologically, compare his "artistic style", and make your own determinations.
I Saw the picture. The toes, the Mouff.. And was almost as grossed out as the first time I Saw a guy eat a booger. I didn't look at the leg. Reading All those Sherlock Ho!mes books was entertaining,, but sometimes I think I didn't learn a Dammed thing. Hell,even without the scientific measurement to get a reasonable scale worked out,, that leg is just Way smaller than it Otta be.
ReplyDeleteIn my defense, I was not interested in the leg,,nope,, the toes in the mouth sent me scrolling..
Or a midget
ReplyDeleteWell, not necessarily.
ReplyDeleteThe Oscar is held in front of the face, so you can't simply assume measurements in one plane are the same as measurements in another.
The equation for an apparent height of 4.85 inches is:
4.85 * d2/d1 where d1 is the distance to the Oscar and d2 is the distance to the face for focus at infinity. If you want to include the focal length of the camera, a slightly better one is:
4.85* (d2-f)/d1-f).
You don't know any of these numbers.
Similarly, the leg is not really in the plane of the camera, so there is foreshortening there as well.
Somewhere north of 90% of the Hollyweirdos are captured, Satanic deviants. They do horrible, unmentionable, shit to their victims.
ReplyDeleteAnd I work with a girl, mid-20's, not a midget, but really short. Maybe all of 4'10", maybe. If not for her face, you'd assume she was 10 years old. When she's all decked out in safety gear she looks like a kid on Halloween. I didn't know they made steel toed work boots that small. So there's that.
ReplyDeleteBut yeah, Quentin's a perv. Always has been. There's a foot fetish in all his movies. Boobs, butts, long hair, nice smile, long legs, I get all those things. But feet? Nope, not a thing for me.
I'm an amateur nipplologist. It's a sadly underappreciated specialty. Much of the world's problems would be greatly reduced if we focussed more on nipples.
DeleteHis left hand, however, definitively is in the same focal plane as the statue. The base of the statue is an accurate metric of reference to measure the mystery foot. Observe, the left hand and that foot are also the same focal plane. The old axiom, from the foot, we know the man, it appears the mystery person is about 13, or less.
ReplyDeleteNo visual indicators of dwarfism, or other physical anomolies. The appearance is not of a more developed anatomy, minimizing the likelihood of a person post pubescent/adult.
Psychologically, compare his "artistic style", and make your own determinations.