“ Filthie’s problem is that he doesn’t know what he doesn’t know, and then he expounds on that.…”
- General Aesop (Ret.)
🤨?
I’ve built multirotor drones. I’ve flown them. I’ve tried to carry payloads purportedly being used in the ‘Kraine every day. I poasted my results on the old Thunderbox blog. But physics and science are irrelevant. People’s eyes glaze over, icky math and physics start getting bandied about, and psyops, urban legends and Big Lies become real. “Ebola!!! We’re all gonna diiiiiiieeee! Covid!!! Ebola again!!! Russia is a paper tiger! The Ukes will lick them in two weeks!!! Oh no!!! The Russians are going to roll over Poland and then onto Germany!!!” Aesop entertains me.
HOWEVER: The fiddly-bits and pieces parts that ARE on the inside tend to get bombarded and break down, no matter how reinforced over time, requiring the aforementioned maintenance to keep the thing able to go and do that “Earth Shattering Kaboom!” when people want/need it to….”
-Tiny
Tiny entertains me too, but not the way General Aesop does. You can ask the guy questions and he’ll try to answer you - often with a free rude joke or story thrown in. If you stump him with a question he can’t answer he’ll shrug and tell ya he doesn’t know. General Aesop will huff and puff and blow your pants house down.
Yesterday we were talking about the mysterious surveillance drones looking for nukes. I expressed concern; I didn’t say we should head for the fallout shelters or that were all gonna die. Ain’t saying that today. I’m saying we need to ask questions. We need answers from experts - not opinions by stubfarts and retards.
I love Tiny, and I love Matt Bracken. As shithouse area analysts and military consultants those guys have been spot on the money from the very start of the Ukrainian conflict. But like crapcopters in weaponized applications… they’ve been suckered. They’ve heard others shooting their faces off and they’re parroting what they’ve heard. I’ve inadvertently done it too. It’s all General Aesop ever does. I’m not trying to shit on Tiny or Bracken - I’m using them (and myself) to make a point. Often we need to question ourselves and separate what we know from what we think we know. I’m using General Aesop to underline that point.
So…maintaining a nuclear arsenal, eh? I’m being told plutonium will rot the guts out of its delivery system and needs constant care and TLC from warlocks and mages, and since the rag heads are all turd brained goat humpers, they’d never actually be able to deploy one. Weeeeeeelp…
Plutonium is not magic. For all the world plutonium resembles any other piece of machined steel. It doesn’t glow, or emit rhythmic humming sounds. People are often disappointed in the appearance of weapons grade fissiles because they look so boring and mundane. No, plutonium isn’t caustic or an oxidizing agent. If there’s any rust or corrosion in the warhead - it came from the ambient environment around the warhead. Your rifle can rust too. The half life is north of 25 thousand years, and while plutonium decays over time… the yield falls off very slowly over decades. When they are removed, warheads are often refurbed for use in lower yield weapons. What fiddly bits are we talking about? Not trying to be a dink, I’m asking because I don’t know? And how are they compromised?
The bomb itself is straightforward and simple. Basically it’s a gun that fires a slug at the fissile material and the deformation of that material induces the critical mass sustain the chain reaction that explodes the bomb. Here is the kicker: Tritium is used as sort of a “catalyst” to lower the initial energies required to start the fission process … and it must be replaced periodically because Tritium has a half life of just over 12 years. I suspect that the vast majority of weapons maintenance are reliability checks on the electronics and delivery systems. It’s the rocket that tends to require the lion’s share of attention. Can the rags get Tritium on the black market? Does anyone know? Because I don’t!
So. What’re the chances the rag heads or other bad actors have viable nuclear weapons in the US? I’d say it’s guaranteed. Why bother with subs and rockets and naval support fleets? Buy a property in Russia (or NYFC, Tel Aviv or Paris) - and build your bomb in the basement. Or stash your preferred WMD in a van or a couple hundred mislabeled bottles of Sarin in a warehouse somewhere… the nightmares are endless. Tom Clancy is your friend.
Yet, we always convince ourselves that our enemies are stupid and incompetent. Two years ago Aesop told us the Russians were incompetent drunken peasants with garbage equipment. Welp… they’ve killed over a million Ukes so far. Today Aesop is bleating that the Russians can menace the rest of Europe.
Today guys like Aesop are laughing at those stupid goat humping ragheads. Weelllp… A couple months back, some rags put the run on a US Naval group in the Red Sea. Iran targeted and destroyed several heavily defended targets in Israel with hypersonic missiles.
The world is changing. The balance of power has shifted. The western countries no longer have the tactical advantages we had in the 90s. Yet we bully and provoke people everywhere as if we have the divine right to do so and nothing has changed.
Are those drones really harmless diversions? Do you have any idea who came over your borders in the last 5 years? Do you have any idea what’s come over your borders?
I think the problem is that everybody is comparing apples to oranges. Where I believe you are referring to hobby drones that can be purchased for a few hundred dollars at most with a wingspan of under 2 feet. The others are referring to commercial drones that cost several thousand dollars with wingspans greater than 2 feet that are specifically built for carrying several pounds of payload.
ReplyDeleteYes I remind people of that regularly. The big fixed wing drones are a different can of worms. The Achilles Heel of electric drones are the batteries… big or small. They’re heavy and don’t offer the energy density of liquid fuel and IC engines.
DeleteI figure the Joe-boys have their hands on this and will want for nothing, as far as info and materials go.
ReplyDeleteMy take on it has changed after watching a Paul Joseph Watson video. Never thought I'd say that ! My thoughts are they are intended to promote FEAR in the sheeple, and Big Daddy Govt is going to make everyone safe by introducing a shit-load of new drone laws. Nothing else makes sense. Why else would they be flying only at night with FAA approved running lights on? They are not flying in a grid pattern apparently. Seems to be all random patterns to make people pissed off or SCARED. And furthermore, the US govt has publicly said they don't know what they are . . . and the govt ALWAYS tells the truth eh?
ReplyDeleteSomething is up, that is for sure…
DeleteThe rag heads have tried whiz-bang manufacture before, and at the time a rather large group called in sick due to radiation poisoning. It turned out that none of them knew how to handle radioactive material.
ReplyDeleteIf the US Government tells us, the general public, that they don't know anything about the invasion of the drones, you can bet the farm that they know all about it. If the US Government says there's nothing to worry about, that means that there's plenty to worry about - but they don't want the civilians involved.
One thing to consider is that no laws have been broken as yet. So capturing the drone and the owner of same is a bit fruitless. A part of this flying fruit factory are ultralight aircraft, which, given the season and the weather, is going to make flying one of those death traps a mighty cold business. I'm thinking survival suit and a very savvy pilot. Plus you have to land the thing and store it somewhere.
We'll see what happens, but I may be joining you in Canada at some point.
We have onerous drone laws here already. I don’t really comply with them much. But then again I respect people and fly where I’m welcome.
DeleteI don't mind Aesop, most of the time. The guy can write well enough that the title of his blog, 'The Raconteur Report', is an apt name for it.
ReplyDeleteI never understood why he was so amped up about the Ukraine conflict 'kicking off' in 2022, especially when I don't recall him saying anything north of 'jack shit' prior, and going back, to 2014 when the coup that ousted Yanukovich happened and the shit storm actually started.
I guess what really annoys me about Aesop is pretty much the same damn thing that pisses me off about 98% of the rest of the regulars I've come across in the 'bloggosphere' and the comment sections within: he will fedpost incessantly, ranting about the wrongs he sees (and being rightly pissed off about it), then goes on to post these veiled tough guy threats about 'Pineland Rules', citizens taking up arms, getting his readers all fired up and all that shit...and of course he doesn't get any closer to that than anyone else out there. Because, like everyone else out there (and I do speak for myself too), he's mostly full of shit.
Aesop's really just another mouthpiece. Probably best to regard him as such.
I guess that what we all are, eh? Mouth pieces…
DeleteGeneral Aesop, lol, isn’t the general a nurse or something? Many years ago an aid worker friend told me that once he met the headman of a village in Africa.....the headman had on western shirt and pants sans shoes, glasses with no lenses, and his most prized possession was a pocketful of ballpoint pens even though he couldn’t read or write.....but he had status among the villagers because they had no pens and he did, reminds me of the general.
ReplyDeleteModern nuclear bombs are not the gun type, they are implosion devices.
ReplyDeleteThere are plenty of sources on the web explaining basic warhead design. That's where I learned about it. Those sources also talk about the relationship the nuclear power industry has to bomb production. Put most simply, making bombs is easier than having a nuclear power industry.
There are also others putting forth an interesting opinion that nuclear bombs are not real. Since everything else told to us by government has proven to be false it is highly likely that nuclear bombs are one more boogie man used to keep us in fear.
Thank you Mr. Filthie, spot on as usual.
ReplyDeleteLittle Boy and Fat Man were the two atomic bombs dropped on Japan during World War II. Little Boy, dropped on Hiroshima, used a gun-type design with uranium-235, while Fat Man, dropped on Nagasaki, employed an implosion-type design with plutonium-239.
ReplyDeleteWELL HELL! I MEAN, HEY!! I'm just a tard but very entertained and ejumakated. Thanks Glen, JL, y'all...Aesop!
ReplyDeleteHey Glen! Good comments over at my haus! LOVE the banter. As far as radiation 'eating up gear' All you need to do is observe the Robots that were sent into Chernobyl as I mentioned or even even more recently, Fukushima. At the "Big C" the “liquidators” (i.e. the Russkie Meat Puppets that were being used to clean up the roof(s) and such after) started taking such HIGH casualties (as in TOO BIG to hide) they sent out early Russian Built Robot-skies. They were ALL remote control and video controlled. Some were in bulldozer configuration to push the graphite chunks (the MOAST Irradiated rubble EVVAR!) off the roof where it could then be collected and buried/entombed.
ReplyDeleteThe majority of them Robotskies last ONLY a few hours before the rads cooked them dead. Granted they were EARLY Russian Primitive Tech (1986) but still, the robotskies they landed on the Moon, Mars and Venus lasted longer in many instances, and IMO in MUCH more hostile environments than the ones that to this day are DOA in place on the roof of Chernobyl.
Cut to 2011 at Fukushima.
25 years later, and Tech has come a LONG way.
Did you know we still haven't got good pictures inside the reactors there yet?
Reason Being?
ALL the Robotsamas that the Japa-he-knows have sent in?
Made roastie-toastie by the Radiation inside. Even the ones they HARDENED like motherfuckers got burned up and out.
That the JAPS who invented the idea of robots and robotech haven't been able to come up with a viable robot that can function in THAT HIGH an irradiated environment?
So inside a Nuke?
Yeah... I'm not a bomb tech, but I knew and worked with a qualified home-brewed bomb (nuke) tech in Iraq. I've written about him before, his nickname is "Doctor Evil" aka Jason Coster-Mullen. He and his dad John, at Dads insistence reverse engineered the Little Boy so well, that the DOE, DoD and a whole slew of folks freaked the fuck out when they made a working model (sans Uranium) in their Garage, and published a book about it. They actually BOTH were made honorary members of the 509th Bomb Wing for their achievement(s).
The reason I nicknamed him "Dr. Evil" is that he shaved his head bald in Iraq, wore those itty-bitty little German-looking round glasses frames with THICK lenses, and I mean really? What the fuck do you nickname a Army Geek who builds a fucking potentially operational Nuclear Weapon in his garage as a weekend project for funsies? Great Guy... can hold his beer too... this reminds me I need to call him... been a tad too long... I owe him a call.
So NO Fucking DOUBT, there's more than likely some solid state chips/boards/ circuits whatever that get fried over time inside a bomb, and need subsequent replacement.
Hell, just as a Grunt, WE had shit that needed to be replaced just from 'normal wear and tear'... Us Grunts tend to be hard on the equipment, in the short OR the long.
Favorite joke about that:
Take a Infantryman, strip him buckass nekkid. Pull out his teeth and fingernails, as well as his toenails. Lock him in a blacked-out room, with a 100 pound anvil overnight.
The next morning the anvil will be broken in two, and the Grunt will swear that he has NO IDEA as to how it happened.